Justice is like the water that flows from a rocky stream to the sea. The water that gives others life, redemption, and rebirth. This liquid justice is fragmented and needs all the pieces to get the whole ocean. However, what is justice? Justice is subjective, a rare word that can be defined in many different ways. By definition, justice can be defined as “moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, or equity”. Justice can also be defined as “the administering of deserved punishment or reward”. However, these definitions are subjective and can differ from person to person. The principles of justice strive on the idea of being fair, but the state of fairness is an opinion that is justified through our own mindsets. Is it fair to take matters into one's own hands and seek self justice? Is it fair for someone to endure a lifetime's worth of trauma, but the assailant only gets a few months in prison? Does fairness lie within the law or personal agenda? It is a broad term when you really think about it that does not have one true answer, but yet as a society, we rely so much of our own ideals. Morals, laws, equality all being deemed on the principal of being fair or just in reason.
Since the meaning of justice varies, the question of when does justice turn to vigilantism? When does justice cross the border line of revenge? Francis Bacon once described revenge as “a wild justice”. Although, what is the subject that makes revenge seem horrific or dark and justice seems like the light? Is it vengeful for the victim to want their attacker to get what they deserve or is it justice? Where does the illuminating righteousness of justice end and the quiet sinful night of revenge take over? In my opinion the answer lies within the acts that came afterward, were they evil, peaceful, lawful? To me, revenge is self justice where the person seeks to cause an equal sense of pain to the one who hurt them through evil acts. Fighting evil
with evil only creates more malicious space in this world and does not solve anything. Although some may believe that fighting back with the same energy is a form of justice, it is not due to its purely selfish reasons. The act of selfishness is the subject that divides these two. Justice should be the betterment of everyone not just oneself. Aristotle said it best "equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally." By this he meant that people should be treated equally and the differences that set them apart should not be factored into the equation. For instance if two people are doing the same exact job, then both of them should be paid the same amount, that is the fair thing to do. The unjust thing would be to pay the workers two unequal amounts because of the color of their skin, gender, and or religion. This does not fit the idea of justice as it favors a certain group. With all this information in mind, I define justice as a fairness in which the “fairness” are actions that are equal and non discriminatory. Where similar problems have a consistent punishment and do not difentainte for any reason. Where egocentric desires are restrained and the betterment of the people are put forward.
Citations: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/justice
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/justice-and-fairness/
https://academichelp.net/samples/academics/essays/definition/justice.html#:~:text=Justice%20 in%20its%20legal%20and,this%20ideal%20and%20state%20laws.&text=As%20you%20can %20see%2C%20justice%20is%20multifaceted.
Hello Jaylin! I like your metaphor of justice that you put in the beginning of your post since it conveys the strong positive connotation behind the word. I also like how you mentioned that it is very subjective since I believe that true justice and freedom can never truly be achieved with everyone. It was cool to me that you transitioned from talking about justice vigilantism since both vigilantism and justice are subjective and can have their differences blurred due to circumstances and people's emotions in the heat of the moment. Great post!
ReplyDelete-Jordan Lin
JAYLIN wow this was an amazingly relevant and informative piece, I love the analogy used to portray justice it helped to make this piece more realistic. All and all this poem was definitely one of my favorites so far. -Shannon Thompson
ReplyDeleteJaylin this was a really well written piece and a topic that is so important and needs to be talked about. There's a lot of emotion in this piece which really brings it to life. Good job on writing such a well written and informative piece :) -Hailee Cianciminio
ReplyDeleteHi Jaylin, this was a very interesting and informative topic. I really like how you included different metaphors and examples to explain and expressed your own thoughts. You were also able to make me see your idea of justice and will take into consideration your definition when I view justice myself now. Overall good job!
ReplyDelete- Diane Rodriguez
reading this felt like reading an incredibly moving speech, this is something that needs to be heard worldwide especially because of how relevant the topic is. Using statements from very popular and influential people really bring your blog post to a whole new level. the constant use of rhetorical questions as well really elevates your tone and emphasizes your argument, well done! - Edana Avila
ReplyDeleteHi Jaylin! this was a really pretty piece that I believe everyone needs to hear. Good Job!
ReplyDelete-Brianna Cordova
I really loved how well-worded and precise this was, i would compare it to the beginning movie dialogue to a serious topic. I love that this is really relevant for today and how objective you tried to be by asking rhetorical questions to the reader. Good job! -Ruby Treto
ReplyDeleteNow that is a very good question and everyone have their own opinion of what Justice means to them and how they define it. Your piece was very informative on a question that has universal meanings. This is an Amazing piece!
ReplyDelete-Keke Pandher
Ah, this is so informative and extremely relevant! The subjective nature of justice and understanding its meaning are very expansive topics for discussion. Very retrospective and elegantly written, this is a wodnerful piece! - Sumbal Sharif
ReplyDeleteHi Jaylin! I thoroughly enjoyed reading your piece. I liked how you brought the dictionary definitions in the beginning and afterwards, shifting to how you feel about them. I also agree with your definition of justice, because as you said, other factors shouldn't matter when dealing with the judging of actions.
ReplyDelete-Darren Domond